The best AI video generator, tested

Every AI video model on this site received the same nine prompts, requesting five seconds where supported: a product turntable, a person speaking, a title card, a camera move, a spill, hands at work, a market, a woodblock print and a still photo brought to life. We paid for every clip, recorded the wait and the cost, and kept the failures. This page ranks them prompt by prompt, with the whole roster visible under each verdict. The September 18 additions are H3 Max, H3 Max Turbo, LTX 2.3 Pro and PixVerse V6. New observations use sampled frames across the clips; audio has not been scored by ear. Longer workflow tests live on the relevant model pages and are excluded from this short-shot ranking.

Anvisha Pai

Anvisha Pai, Co-founder & CEO, Voyager

Verified

The short answer

  1. 1.Veo 3.1 Fast is the model most people should ship: clean text, the best crowd and camera work, native audio, under two minutes a clip. $0.10 per second with audio, 720p via Gemini API.
  2. 2.Seedance 2.0 is the best-looking set on the roster and the most natural talking head, at five times Kling's price. $0.3034 per second at 720p, 16:9 via fal.
  3. 3.Wan 3.0 is the best value: steady, consistent and 30-second clips, with a content checker that refused one prompt. $0.10 per second at 720p via fal.
  4. 4.Kling 3.0 Standard for 15-second clips and multi-shot storyboards without on-screen text, if you can wait for fal's queue. $0.126 per second, audio on via fal.
  5. 5.Veo 3.1 when a hero shot needs the last bit of polish or 4K; otherwise Fast is the same look for a quarter of the price. $0.40 per second with audio, 720p or 1080p via Gemini API.
  6. 6.H3 Max Turbo is a low-cost draft option with readable title text in this run; its promotion ends September 30. $0.02 per second at 768p via fal.

Every model, measured

ModelVendorPriceSeconds to make one clip9 clips cost
Gemini Omni FlashGoogle DeepMind$0.10 per second of 720p video
via Gemini API
36 to 64$5.85
Grok Imagine Video 1.5xAI$0.08 per second
via xAI API
36 to 49$6.30
H3 Max Turbofal / MiniMax$0.02 per second at 768p
via fal
6 to 6$0.90
H3 Maxfal / MiniMax$0.04 per second at 768p
via fal
6 to 26$1.80
MiniMax H3MiniMax$0.06 per second at 768p
via fal
52 to 182$2.70
Hailuo 2.3MiniMax$0.28 per six-second clip, standard 768p
via fal
98 to 197$2.52
Kling 3.0 StandardKuaishou$0.126 per second, audio on
via fal
129 to 729$5.67
Kling 3.0 ProKuaishou$0.168 per second, audio on
via fal
134 to 692$7.56
LTX 2.3Lightricks$0.08 per second at 1080p
via fal
54 to 73$4.32
Luma Ray 3.2Luma AI$0.30 per five-second clip at 720p
via Luma app
62 to 187$9.00
PixVerse V6PixVerse$0.06 per second at 720p with audio
via fal
49 to 88$2.70
Seedance 2.0ByteDance$0.3034 per second at 720p, 16:9
via fal
88 to 148$13.61
Seedance 2.5ByteDance$0.4622 per second at 720p, 16:9
via fal
170 to 1578$18.49
Sora 2OpenAI$0.10 per second at 720p, sora-2
via OpenAI API
67 to 200$3.60
Veo 3.1 FastGoogle DeepMind$0.10 per second with audio, 720p
via Gemini API
52 to 96$8.10
Veo 3.1Google DeepMind$0.40 per second with audio, 720p or 1080p
via Gemini API
67 to 108$21.60
Veo 3.1 LiteGoogle DeepMind$0.05 per second with audio, 720p
via Gemini API
37 to 102$2.70
Wan 3.0Alibaba$0.10 per second at 720p
via fal
128 to 194$4.00
Wan 2.7Alibaba$0.10 per second at 720p
via fal
41 to 134$4.00

Seconds and cost are from our own runs of the same 9 prompts through every model, one try each.

Seedance 2.0 gives the most natural face and delivery; Veo 3.1 Fast and Wan 3.0 are close for much less. Grok burned a subtitle in, Sora 2 barely moved, Hailuo 2.3 is silent. Luma Ray 3.2 is silent but its performance is natural.

1Seedance 2.0116s · $1.51
2Veo 3.1 Fast52s · $0.90
3Wan 3.0170s · $0.50
4MiniMax H362s · $0.30
Gemini Omni Flash36s · $0.65
H3 Max Turbo6s · $0.10
H3 Max6s · $0.20
Hailuo 2.3143s · $0.28
Kling 3.0 Standard546s · $0.63
Kling 3.0 Pro665s · $0.84
LTX 2.362s · $0.48
Luma Ray 3.298s · $1.00
PixVerse V660s · $0.30
Seedance 2.5272s · $2.31
Sora 287s · $0.40
Veo 3.177s · $2.40
Veo 3.1 Lite42s · $0.30
Wan 2.7108s · $0.50

Animated title card

This prompt in full →

Veo in both main tiers, Seedance 2.0, MiniMax H3 and Hailuo 2.3 spelled the title. Both Kling tiers garbled it; both Wan endpoints refused it. H3 Max, Turbo and PixVerse V6 resolve into readable titles; LTX 2.3 garbles the lettering.

1Veo 3.185s · $2.40
2Seedance 2.088s · $1.51
3Veo 3.1 Fast52s · $0.90
4MiniMax H3104s · $0.30
5Hailuo 2.3134s · $0.28
Gemini Omni Flash45s · $0.65
H3 Max Turbo6s · $0.10
H3 Max6s · $0.20
Kling 3.0 Standard533s · $0.63
Kling 3.0 Pro656s · $0.84
LTX 2.373s · $0.48
Luma Ray 3.2187s · $1.00
PixVerse V649s · $0.30
Seedance 2.5170s · $2.31
Sora 295s · $0.40
Veo 3.1 Lite55s · $0.30
Refused or failed; the model page has the error.
Refused or failed; the model page has the error.

Product turntable

This prompt in full →

Veo 3.1 Fast, Hailuo 2.3, Wan 3.0 and Kling Standard held the product through the turn. Wan 2.7 and Gemini added cuts; Seedance 2.5 opened on a blur.

1Veo 3.1 Fast80s · $0.90
2Hailuo 2.398s · $0.28
3Wan 3.0144s · $0.50
4Kling 3.0 Standard729s · $0.63
Gemini Omni Flash36s · $0.65
H3 Max Turbo6s · $0.10
H3 Max6s · $0.20
MiniMax H3104s · $0.30
Kling 3.0 Pro682s · $0.84
LTX 2.373s · $0.48
Luma Ray 3.262s · $1.00
PixVerse V660s · $0.30
Seedance 2.0148s · $1.51
Seedance 2.5477s · $2.31
Sora 277s · $0.40
Veo 3.167s · $2.40
Veo 3.1 Lite37s · $0.30
Wan 2.7121s · $0.50

Wan 3.0, Seedance 2.0 and Kling kept the photographed product exactly. Gemini gave it a handle, Seedance 2.5 refused the job.

1Wan 3.0128s · $0.50
2Seedance 2.0106s · $1.51
3Kling 3.0 Pro134s · $0.84
4Veo 3.196s · $2.40
Gemini Omni Flash64s · $0.65
H3 Max Turbo6s · $0.10
H3 Max6s · $0.20
MiniMax H352s · $0.30
Hailuo 2.3103s · $0.28
Kling 3.0 Standard129s · $0.63
LTX 2.373s · $0.48
Luma Ray 3.272s · $1.00
PixVerse V688s · $0.30
Refused or failed; the model page has the error.
Sora 2116s · $0.40
Veo 3.1 Fast96s · $0.90
Veo 3.1 Lite68s · $0.30
Wan 2.741s · $0.50

Veo 3.1 Fast's aerial is the most convincing; Wan 3.0 and Gemini Omni Flash move the camera with the town intact.

1Veo 3.1 Fast64s · $0.90
2Wan 3.0161s · $0.50
3Gemini Omni Flash45s · $0.65
4Kling 3.0 Standard533s · $0.63
H3 Max Turbo6s · $0.10
H3 Max6s · $0.20
MiniMax H3182s · $0.30
Hailuo 2.3167s · $0.28
Kling 3.0 Pro656s · $0.84
LTX 2.354s · $0.48
Luma Ray 3.298s · $1.00
PixVerse V649s · $0.30
Seedance 2.088s · $1.51
Seedance 2.51578s · $2.31
Sora 267s · $0.40
Veo 3.196s · $2.40
Veo 3.1 Lite68s · $0.30
Wan 2.7102s · $0.50

Veo 3.1 throws the best spill and Veo 3.1 Lite the biggest splash. Wan 2.7 grew the ice cubes; Seedance 2.5 turned the water to haze. LTX 2.3 suspends the glass in its middle sampled frame; PixVerse rounds the ice and loses the glass late in the shot.

1Veo 3.177s · $2.40
2Veo 3.1 Lite60s · $0.30
3Seedance 2.0132s · $1.51
4Wan 3.0178s · $0.50
Gemini Omni Flash45s · $0.65
H3 Max Turbo6s · $0.10
H3 Max6s · $0.20
MiniMax H362s · $0.30
Hailuo 2.3197s · $0.28
Kling 3.0 Standard507s · $0.63
Kling 3.0 Pro665s · $0.84
LTX 2.373s · $0.48
Luma Ray 3.287s · $1.00
PixVerse V660s · $0.30
Seedance 2.5231s · $2.31
Sora 287s · $0.40
Veo 3.1 Fast80s · $0.90
Wan 2.7108s · $0.50

Kling 3.0 Pro poured best with the props intact. Half the roster swapped the filter for a cup.

1Kling 3.0 Pro673s · $0.84
2Seedance 2.0127s · $1.51
3Wan 3.0161s · $0.50
4Veo 3.172s · $2.40
Gemini Omni Flash64s · $0.65
H3 Max Turbo6s · $0.10
H3 Max6s · $0.20
MiniMax H362s · $0.30
Hailuo 2.3182s · $0.28
Kling 3.0 Standard502s · $0.63
LTX 2.373s · $0.48
Luma Ray 3.287s · $1.00
PixVerse V660s · $0.30
Seedance 2.5431s · $2.31
Sora 2146s · $0.40
Veo 3.1 Fast80s · $0.90
Veo 3.1 Lite42s · $0.30
Wan 2.7121s · $0.50

Veo 3.1 Fast's market is the densest and most legible; Wan 3.0, Seedance 2.0 and MiniMax H3 hold up. Kling's people look painted.

1Veo 3.1 Fast69s · $0.90
2Wan 3.0194s · $0.50
3Seedance 2.0132s · $1.51
4MiniMax H3104s · $0.30
Gemini Omni Flash57s · $0.65
H3 Max Turbo6s · $0.10
H3 Max26s · $0.20
Hailuo 2.3134s · $0.28
Kling 3.0 Standard541s · $0.63
Kling 3.0 Pro692s · $0.84
LTX 2.362s · $0.48
Luma Ray 3.267s · $1.00
PixVerse V660s · $0.30
Seedance 2.5436s · $2.31
Sora 2146s · $0.40
Veo 3.196s · $2.40
Veo 3.1 Lite102s · $0.30
Wan 2.7134s · $0.50

Specific art style

This prompt in full →

Veo 3.1 stays a woodblock print in every frame; MiniMax H3 and Veo Lite hold the style with lively waves. Hailuo washed out.

1Veo 3.1108s · $2.40
2MiniMax H3116s · $0.30
3Veo 3.1 Lite60s · $0.30
4Wan 3.0170s · $0.50
Gemini Omni Flash56s · $0.65
H3 Max Turbo6s · $0.10
H3 Max6s · $0.20
Hailuo 2.3197s · $0.28
Kling 3.0 Standard518s · $0.63
Kling 3.0 Pro665s · $0.84
LTX 2.373s · $0.48
Luma Ray 3.287s · $1.00
PixVerse V660s · $0.30
Seedance 2.0132s · $1.51
Seedance 2.5359s · $2.31
Sora 2200s · $0.40
Veo 3.1 Fast96s · $0.90
Wan 2.7108s · $0.50

Head to head

Frequently asked questions

What is the best AI video generator in 2026?

On the same nine clips, Veo 3.1 Fast is the best all-round model for the money, Seedance 2.0 looks best, Wan 3.0 is the best value, and Kling 3.0 wins on clip length and storyboards but cannot render text. Every verdict on this page links to the clips behind it.

What is the best free AI video generator?

None of these models has a free API. The Kling app gives 66 credits a day with a watermark, Dreamina and Hailuo give daily credits, fal's Wan 3 page offers five free 720p clips a day, and Google's Gemini app includes a few Veo clips on paid plans. Each model page lists the free tier in detail.

Which AI video generator has audio?

All of them here except Hailuo 2.3: Veo 3.1, Kling 3.0, Seedance, Sora 2, Grok Imagine Video, Wan 2.7 and 3.0, MiniMax H3 and Gemini Omni Flash all generate sound with the picture.

How much does AI video cost?

From $0.28 for a silent six-second Hailuo clip to $2.40 for six seconds of Veo 3.1 with audio, at 720p, on fal, read on 10 September 2026. The table above shows what our nine clips cost on every model.

Is Sora 2 still available?

Only until 24 September 2026, when OpenAI removes it from the API; the app closed in April. Its clips are on this page for comparison, and its own page names the replacements.

Anvisha Pai

Anvisha Pai

Co-founder & CEO, Voyager

Anvisha is the CEO of Voyager and a repeat, Y Combinator-backed startup founder. She was previously a PM at Dropbox. She believes nobody should need a design degree to make something that looks great.

Voyager

Run any of these inside Voyager

Voyager is an agent for creative work that runs every model on this page. Brief it, and it picks the model for the job, makes the thing and hands back something you can edit. Create an account to get started.